
Indian entrepreneurs drawn to corporate VC – AVCJ Forum
Indian technology start-ups are seeing corporate venture capital arms as attractive partners, but investors must be prepared to show what differentiates them from their parent companies, industry participants told the AVCJ India Forum.
“We're a $30 million fund, and people used to ask why are you not writing $50 million per check, when the group has access to significant amounts of capital,” said Gaurav Sachdeva, managing partner at JSW Ventures, the venture arm of JSW Group that launched in 2015. “Why not look at iron ore, and why not look at steel processes. It took us time to establish that we are a technology fund, and what we do is very different than what the parent group does.”
Investors may also face concerns over how their motivations tie with those of their corporate backers. Pankaj Makkar, managing director at Bertelsmann India Investments, recalled that when the firm was founded in 2013 many entrepreneurs thought its purpose was to pursue buyouts on behalf of Bertelsmann. It took several years for most of the ecosystem to understand that the GP wanted to help innovative technology companies, not swallow them up.
However, once a corporate VC investor has established a presence in the market, entrepreneurs can find considerable upside in partnering with them. Though these units might not be able to tap the resources of their parent directly, they are able to connect their portfolio companies with firsthand expertise in a way that is still difficult for many pure VC players.
“There's a lot of positive wealth that we end up creating within the ecosystem, with the entrepreneurs, and they like that a lot,” said Makkar. “Some of the large funds in India now have operating partners and so on, but they are often treated as second-class citizens. If you're not making deals you are not the most exciting person in the fund.”
While helping portfolio companies through these resources, corporate VC investors must also be willing to remind entrepreneurs that their end goals differ from those of their parents. Rather than as mere portals to deep corporate pockets, founders and management teams must understand that their investors have financial obligations to meet and as a result expect certain levels of performance.
“What's worked in our favor is actually being as divorced as possible from headquarters,” said Adit Swarup, a principal at Rakuten Ventures. “When we do want to engage with our parent to have our start-ups work with our parent's digital assets, then it's on a case by case basis, and it's purely based on a meritocracy. So we've taken a conscious approach to distancing ourselves and making sure that all of the liability and the successes for the financial performance rests purely with us.”
Latest News
Asian GPs slow implementation of ESG policies - survey
Asia-based private equity firms are assigning more dedicated resources to environment, social, and governance (ESG) programmes, but policy changes have slowed in the past 12 months, in part due to concerns raised internally and by LPs, according to a...
Singapore fintech start-up LXA gets $10m seed round
New Enterprise Associates (NEA) has led a USD 10m seed round for Singapore’s LXA, a financial technology start-up launched by a former Asia senior executive at The Blackstone Group.
India's InCred announces $60m round, claims unicorn status
Indian non-bank lender InCred Financial Services said it has received INR 5bn (USD 60m) at a valuation of at least USD 1bn from unnamed investors including “a global private equity fund.”
Insight leads $50m round for Australia's Roller
Insight Partners has led a USD 50m round for Australia’s Roller, a venue management software provider specializing in family fun parks.