Asian private equity: Education never ends
It is common knowledge that Asian private equity has been going from strength to strength, generating returns that compare increasingly favorably to those of Western Europe and the US. Indeed, recent figures published by Cambridge Associates suggest that funds focused on this region have outperformed their Western counterparts on a three- and five-year basis.
Emerging Asia was inevitably the star performer and investors have taken notice, allocating ever larger amounts to Asian partnerships, either directly, under the guidance of advisors or through fund-of-funds.
However, after attending the AVCJ Private Equity & Venture Forum - Europe in London last week, I was quite surprised to note that Asia is still perceived negatively by many European investors. This is, of course, the reason why we held the event: to educate European LPs on Asian private equity by offering direct access to GPs in the comfort of a London conference hall. There were approximately 100 attendees and just over one third of them were LPs.
While those who've been allocating for a few years are well-versed in how business is conducted in the various markets of Asia, newer and would-be participants regard it as the wild wild East (and rightfully so, if they listen to horror stories espoused by some LPs who picked the wrong manager). Questions regarding risk in Asian investments - whether it involves regulation, politics, legal issues or corruption - came up several times during the event.
Notably, one LP in the audience asked the opening panel, chaired by Squadron Capital CEO David Pierce, about risk premiums for investments into emerging markets. The panelists, Francis Leung of CVC Capital Partners, Nick Bloy of Navis Capital Partners, Girish Kumar of Apollo Global Management and Joe Bae of KKR, said that their firms focused on absolute returns, with each deal judged on its own merits.
It is a fair point. Any private equity professional with a reasonable track record in Asia should be able to address problems that inevitably arise from time to time.
The issue was raised again during sessions on China, India and Southeast Asia, as well as - more surprisingly - in a question on politics put to Simon Pillar of Pacific Equity Partners as he made a presentation on Australian private equity.
What is the takeaway? Surely, Asia's private equity industry must do a better job of communicating to newer investors the intricacies of doing business in different markets, structuring deals and how risk factors can be minimized. This is essential if Western investors who have expressed an interest in building an exposure to Asia are to turn their words into action.
Latest News
Asian GPs slow implementation of ESG policies - survey
Asia-based private equity firms are assigning more dedicated resources to environment, social, and governance (ESG) programmes, but policy changes have slowed in the past 12 months, in part due to concerns raised internally and by LPs, according to a...
Singapore fintech start-up LXA gets $10m seed round
New Enterprise Associates (NEA) has led a USD 10m seed round for Singapore’s LXA, a financial technology start-up launched by a former Asia senior executive at The Blackstone Group.
India's InCred announces $60m round, claims unicorn status
Indian non-bank lender InCred Financial Services said it has received INR 5bn (USD 60m) at a valuation of at least USD 1bn from unnamed investors including “a global private equity fund.”
Insight leads $50m round for Australia's Roller
Insight Partners has led a USD 50m round for Australia’s Roller, a venue management software provider specializing in family fun parks.








