To market, to market, to market we go
Last year, in the first half of 2009, private equity fundraising fell 60-70% according to various estimates. This year, executives in private equity all seem to be racking up the air miles, on a mission to convince LPs around the world that they have fared well enough through the downturn to deserve a few more dollars.
By AVCJ Research's count, over 380 firms are raising Asia-dedicated, or in part Asia-earmarked, funds. Those with a considerable track record have, at least anecdotally, had an easier time getting firm commitments, while those still sorting through some of the wreckage of the past 18 months have had to do a bit more selling.
Academics from MIT argue that boom years in private equity lead to lower returns, and that buyout funds tend to fare the worst coming out of that cycle. Common sense, right? One would think; but when the iron is hot, the desire to strike often overtakes logic.
In recent conversations, a number of LPs and some of the more reflective GPs noted that the crisis had not actually lasted very long, and that in some countries, other market factors were at play and thus the country was relatively insulated. They all expressed concern about what this might mean for a change of perspective within the industry, or a lack thereof.
So what of leverage, easy money and an eye for the bull, not the bear? And what about all those fees? In a draft proposal submitted recently by Clearwater Capital Partners to CalPERS as part of the latter's review of placement agent usage by its invested GPs, the fees requested by at least one leading placement agent for Clearwater's 2004 fundraising for Fund II call into question what is reasonable and what is not. At $20,000 per month retainer, a cash fee of 1.25% of legally binding capital and loan commitments, 25% of the private equity base success fee, 12.5% of any carried interest, fees for shared investors, rejection fees, fees in the event of termination and out-of-pocket expenses, it would have been a wonder if Clearwater had anything left to work with.
While these terms are par for the course, should they be? Industry standard does not always translate into best practice. In the same vein, just because firms have come out the other end of a particularly grueling downturn does not mean they did nothing wrong.
As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding, and so will be the evidence of any thoughtful introspection once announcements of final closes are released and investments start being made. The year 2010 could be more than simply a year of good vintages, but only if humility replaces hubris as every MD's favorite trait.
Latest News
Asian GPs slow implementation of ESG policies - survey
Asia-based private equity firms are assigning more dedicated resources to environment, social, and governance (ESG) programmes, but policy changes have slowed in the past 12 months, in part due to concerns raised internally and by LPs, according to a...
Singapore fintech start-up LXA gets $10m seed round
New Enterprise Associates (NEA) has led a USD 10m seed round for Singapore’s LXA, a financial technology start-up launched by a former Asia senior executive at The Blackstone Group.
India's InCred announces $60m round, claims unicorn status
Indian non-bank lender InCred Financial Services said it has received INR 5bn (USD 60m) at a valuation of at least USD 1bn from unnamed investors including “a global private equity fund.”
Insight leads $50m round for Australia's Roller
Insight Partners has led a USD 50m round for Australia’s Roller, a venue management software provider specializing in family fun parks.





